Back

Journal Club: Manual compression of abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation

Article

Author: Tim France

Date of first publication: 18.05.2021

Last change: 20.02.2023

Changed categorization to exclude Application

Our latest Journal Club presentation looks at expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and the use of abdominal compression as a means of assessment.

Journal Club: Manual compression of abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation

We briefly cover the causes and detrimental effects of EFL, as well as techniques for assessing it, before presenting the key findings of a French study (Lemyze M, Favory R, Alves I, Perez T, Mathieu D. Manual compression of the abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2012;27(1):37-44. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.0111​) from 2012. The authors of that study concluded that manual compression of the abdomen is a simple, safe, and reliable maneuver for detecting and quantifying EFL during mechanical ventilation. The link to the video presentation is available below.

Manual compression of the abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation.

Lemyze M, Favory R, Alves I, Perez T, Mathieu D. Manual compression of the abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2012;27(1):37-44. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.011



PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the manual compression of the abdomen (MCA) during expiration as a simple bedside method to detect expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during daily clinical practice of mechanical ventilation (MV).

METHODS

We studied 44 semirecumbent intubated and sedated critically ill patients. Flow-volume loops obtained during MCA were superimposed upon the preceding breaths and recorded with the ventilator. Expiratory flow limitation was expressed as percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during MCA (MCA [%V(T)]). In the first 13 patients, MCA was validated by comparison with the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique. Esophageal pressure changes during MCA and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure were also recorded in all the patients.

RESULTS

Manual compression of the abdomen and NEP agreed in all cases in detecting EFL with a bias of -0.16%. Percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during MCA is highly correlated with percentage of expiratory tidal volume without any increase in flow during NEP (n = 13, P < .0001, r(2) = 0.99) and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (n = 44, P < .001, r(2) = 0.78), with a good repeatability (n = 44; within-subject SD, 5.7%) and reproducibility (n = 13; within-subject SD, 2.41%). Two third of the patients were flow limited, among whom one third had no previously known respiratory disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual compression of the abdomen provides a simple, rapid, and safe bedside reliable maneuver to detect and quantify EFL during mechanical ventilation.

Downloads for Journal Club: Manual compression of abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation

Video
Journal Club: Manual compression of abdomen to assess expiratory flow limitation
English