Back

The complete guide to high flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC)

Article

Author: Kathrin Seeger, ICU nurse, Hamilton Medical Clinical Application Specialist

Date of first publication: 12.06.2024

Everything healthcare professionals need to know to get started with high flow nasal cannula therapy: the flow rate, FiO2 settings, when to use HFNC, selecting the interface, and much more.

The complete guide to high flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC)

Terminology, symbols, and abbreviations

There is a range of terminology used for high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy: HFNC supportive therapy, high flow therapy (HFT), nasal high flow (NHF), high flow (HF), high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, heated humidified high flow therapy (HHHF), high flow oxygen (HFO) therapy, and high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT). Hamilton Medical uses the term high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy.

Good to know: The term HFNC refers to the therapy itself irrespective of the interface used (nasal cannula or tracheostomy connector).

Patient with In2Flow interface for HFNC
Patient with In2Flow interface for HFNC

Introduction

High flow nasal cannula therapy is a type of respiratory support that delivers heated and humidified gas with a controlled concentration of oxygen to your patients. This therapy has become increasingly popular for hypoxemic respiratory failure.

HFNC is used during early noninvasive management of acute respiratory failure, and has proven to be safe and effective as a noninvasive ventilation method. HFNC has been shown to be potentially useful and efficient in other applications such as major postoperative care, immunocompromised patients, for preoxygenation, or during bronchoscopy (Ischaki E, Pantazopoulos I, Zakynthinos S. Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(145):170028. Published 2017 Aug 9. doi:10.1183/16000617.0028-20172​).

The system used to deliver HFNC requires the following components: a gas blender and flow meter, an active humidifier, a heated inspiratory circuit, and a nasal cannula or a tracheostomy connector as an interface. When we talk about high flow nasal cannula, we need to keep in mind the four elements that describe this therapy: flow, oxygen, heat, and humidity.

If we take a closer look at the meaning of each element, the advantages of using HFNC are clear:

  • Flow: the higher flow rates allow you to set the inspiratory flow to adequately meet or even exceed the inspiratory demand of the patient.
  • Oxygen: you can set the FiO2 more accurately within a range of 21% to 100%. However, consider escalating treatment if FiO2 of greater than 60% is needed to achieve the targeted SpO2.
  • Heat: the gas should be heated to the core body temperature of 37°C (except during NIV where the default temperature is 31°C).
  • Humidity: the breathing gas is saturated close to 100% relative humidity to meet the physiologic demands.

Good to know: Did you know that the inspiratory demands of adult patients with acute respiratory failure can range from 30 l/min to more than 120 l/min?

Illustration of a ventilator with a HAMILTON-H900 humidifier
Illustration of a ventilator with a HAMILTON-H900 humidifier
Image of the four elements of HFNC: flow, oxygen, heat and humidity
Image of the four elements of HFNC: flow, oxygen, heat and humidity
Illustration for the chapter "What are the benefits?"
Illustration for the chapter "What are the benefits?"

What are the benefits of using HFNC?

We can divide the benefits of HFNC into clinical and physiologic as follows.

Clinical benefits:

  • Improved patient comfort and compliance with the treatment
  • Better patient tolerance due to the warmth and humidity of inspired air
  • Ease of use


Physiologic benefits:

  • Improved oxygenation because higher inspiratory flows mean reduced oxygen dilution 
  • Reduction of dead space and CO2 rebreathing compared with low flow oxygen therapy and NIV
  • Reduced work of breathing associated with an improvement in respiratory rate, as well as a reduction in heart rate with a significant improvement in SpO2 measurements
Illustration for the chapter "How does HFNC work??"
Illustration for the chapter "How does HFNC work??"

How does HFNC work? Addressing the limitations of low flow

Before we dive into the working principles of high flow nasal cannula, we need to address the limitations that are typical of low flow oxygen delivery systems. This will help you better understand the beneficial effects of HFNC for your patients.

With conventional oxygen delivery devices, the peak inspiratory flow rate in acute respiratory failure patients exceeds the delivered flow of oxygen. Typical low flow systems provide supplemental O2 directly to the airway at a flow of 8 l/min or less. This O2 provided by a low flow device is always diluted with ambient air (with 21% FiO2); the result is a low and variable FiO2. 

This variable FiO2 may be associated with one or more of the following: the interface used to deliver oxygen, the respiratory rate, the peak inspiratory flow and how the patient breathes (through the mouth or nose).

  • Only 22% to 40% of oxygen at flow rates of up to 6 l/min in adults for low flow nasal cannulas
  • Only 35% to 50% of oxygen at flow rates from 5 to 10 l/min for low flow oxygen masks

Good to know: The use of humidification is recommended when oxygen is supplied through a nasal cannula at flow rates of more than 4 l/min.

Low flow and high flow patient interfaces
Low flow and high flow patient interfaces

Low flow vs. high flow nasal cannula therapy

In contrast to low flow oxygen therapy, the gas flow rate and FiO2 in HFNC can be adjusted independently of one another, depending on the patient‘s inspiratory demands.

With high flow nasal cannula systems, the FiO2 is delivered more accurately and can be set from 21% to 100%.

As mentioned already, the higher flow rates are able to meet or even exceed the patient‘s peak inspiratory flow rate.

The blend of air and oxygen delivered to the patient is fully heated and humidified by the humidification chamber and the single limb heated breathing circuit. This breathing circuit contains heater wires within the tubing wall that minimize condensation.

The therapy is delivered directly into the patient‘s nostrils through a nasal cannula.

During normal inspiration, the PIF demand is 30 to 40 l/min. With high flow nasal cannula therapy, the administered FiO2 would equal the inhaled FiO2, while in the case of a low flow system, the inhaled FiO2 would be less than the administered FiO2 because it is diluted with ambient air (Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010;55(4):408-413. 3​).

For higher flows, adequate humidification is fundamental because it improves the tolerance and compliance of the treatment. HFNC systems require an active heated humidifier to achieve optimal body temperature (37°C in adults and 34°C to 37°C in pediatric patients) with a humidity output of higher than 33 mg H2O/l and close to 100% of relative humidity.

The conditions provided by HFNC promote:

  • Improved lung compliance
  • Improved gas distribution in the lungs
  • Improved mucociliary clearance
  • Decreased airway resistance
  • Increased patient comfort
Illustration of a low flow system
Illustration of a low flow system
Illustration of a high flow system
Illustration of a high flow system
Illustration of flow inside of a patient
Illustration of flow inside of a patient

When to consider high flow nasal therapy

HFNC is considered the first-line therapy for patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and can be part of a treatment strategy, whether during escalation or weaning.

Illustration for when to consider high flow nasal cannula therapy
Illustration for when to consider high flow nasal cannula therapy

Recommendations for HFNC

(Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226-2237. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y4​) (Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(4):2101574. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1183/13993003.01574-20215​)

Clinical indication

Recommendation

Comments

Hypoxemic respiratory failure

Strong recommendation

  • Lower intubation rates
  • Reduction in escalation of respiratory support
  • Cost savings in terms of equipment and intubations avoided

Post-extubation

Conditional recommendation

Post-operative HFNC in high risk and/or obese patients following cardiac or thoracic surgery

Conditional recommendation

  • Lower reintubation rate (compared with COT)
  • Reduction in escalation of respiratory support (compared with COT)

Peri-intubation period

No recommendation

  • Patients who are already receiving high flow should continue with HFNC during intubation
Illustration for the chapter "What is the clinical relevance?"
Illustration for the chapter "What is the clinical relevance?"

What is the clinical relevance of HFNC? The physiologic effects of high flow

Negative end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure can cause ventilator-induced lung injury due to atelectrauma. Studies (Ricard JD, Roca O, Lemiale V, et al. Use of nasal high flow oxygen during acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2238-2247. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06228-76​) have shown that HFNC has multiple physiologic effects ranging from improved lung volumes to decreased work of breathing. The main ones are as follows:

  • High flow generates a washout effect in the upper airways, promoting anatomic dead-space clearance and CO2 removal
  • Increases the end-expiratory lung volume and PaO2/FiO2 ratio
  • Optimal strategy for administering oxygen to hypoxic critically ill patients with high respiratory demand
  • Provision of low-level PEEP
  • The therapy is delivered directly into the patient‘s nostrils through the nasal cannula

Amongst the main physiologic effects of HFNC are an increase in airway pressure and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV), and an improvement in oxygenation. These are more evident with higher flows of around 60 to 70 l/min. However, the beneficial effects on parameters such as dead-space washout, work of breathing, and respiratory rate may be achieved with intermediate flows (20 to 45 l/min)6.

Good to know: The physiologic effects of HFNC can be summarized as improved oxygenation, reduced work of breathing, improved lung protection and better comfort for the patient.

Illustration of the physiologic effects of high flow
Illustration of the physiologic effects of high flow
Illustration for the chapter "How to choose the right interface?"
Illustration for the chapter "How to choose the right interface?"

How to choose the right HFNC interface? Picking the right cannula size

The nasal cannula interface is an essential component for delivery of high flow nasal cannula therapy. In order to maintain an effective flush of CO2, it is important that the cannula does not occlude more than ~50% of the nares.

Good to know: Airway pressure increases progressively with both increasing flow rate and nasal prong-to-nares ratio.

Illustration that shows how to select the right cannula size based on the patient's characteristics
Illustration that shows how to select the right cannula size based on the patient's characteristics
Illustration for the chapter "How to adjust HFNC settings?"
Illustration for the chapter "How to adjust HFNC settings?"

How to adjust HFNC settings?

Below you can find the recommendations on how to set the flow and oxygen in adult and pediatric patients.

Important: Please note that they are only general recommendations, and every patient should be treated based on their specific medical condition.

 

Setting the flow in adult patients

  • Set the flow initially to between 20 and 35 l/min
  • The flow can be increased progressively in steps of 5 to 10 l/min if the respiratory rate fails to improve
  • Increasing flows from 15 to 45 l/min triples the reduction in anatomic dead space
  • To prevent intubation, choose the highest flow tolerated by the patient

(Drake MG. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Adults: An Evidence-based Assessment. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(2):145-155. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-548FR7​)

Setting the flow in pediatric patients

Flow rates that exceed inspiratory demand can be set in patients under 24 months who tolerate flows of 1 to 2 l/kg/min (up to 20 l/min).

(Kwon JW. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children: a clinical review. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020;63(1):3-7. doi:10.3345/kjp.2019.006268​)

Age

Body weight (kg)

Flow range (l/min)

≤ 1 month

< 4

5–8

1–12 months

4–10

8–20

1–6 years

10–20

12–25

6–12 years

20–40

20–30

12–18 years

> 40

25–50

Setting the oxygen in all patient groups

The FiO2 is the concentration of oxygen in the gas mixture delivered to the patient. In HFNC, the FiO2 should be set as follows:

  • You can set the FiO2 from 21% up to 100%.
  • Titrate the FiO2 to achieve the desired SpO2 (target ranges of 92%–96% for most patients and 88%–92% for patients with chronic respiratory disease).
Illustration for the chapter "How to monitor HFNC treatment?"
Illustration for the chapter "How to monitor HFNC treatment?"

How should I monitor patients on HFNC? Monitoring the effectiveness

The ROX index is defined as the ratio of oxygen saturation as measured by SpO2/FiO2 to the respiratory rate. In patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, the ROX index can be used after HFNC therapy has been initiated to help identify those who are at high risk of intubation (Roca O, Messika J, Caralt B, et al. Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: The utility of the ROX index. J Crit Care. 2016;35:200-205. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.0229​).

ROX index ≥ 4.88 after two hours of treatment, indicates a high probability that intubation will not be necessary.

ROX index < 3.85 indicates a higher risk of treatment failure.

ROX index values for when to consider intubation or success
ROX index values for when to consider intubation or success

Recommendations for measuring the ROX index

(Roca O, Messika J, Caralt B, et al. Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: The utility of the ROX index. J Crit Care. 2016;35:200-205. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.0229​)

Chart of ROX index for HFNC
Chart of ROX index for HFNC

SpO2 monitoring

SpO2 is one of the most important parameters to monitor during HFNC. It indicates whether FiO2 needs to be re-adjusted and is useful during FiO2 titration.

How to use SpO2 (If the SpO2 option is not installed, use external patient monitoringA​) measurement on your Hamilton Medical ventilator:

  • Connect the sensor to the device and the patient
  • Select the System tab
  • Activate the SpO2 sensor
Ventilator settings for HFNC and SpO2 monitoring on Hamilton Medical ventilators 1
Ventilator settings for HFNC and SpO2 monitoring on Hamilton Medical ventilators 1

The monitoring shows the values of flow and oxygen over time so you can evaluate the therapy's progress.

How to monitor the progress of the therapy with your Hamilton Medical ventilator:

  • Main monitoring parameters
  • Control flow
  • Oxygen


Trending graphs:

  • Select either Control Flow or Oxygen
Ventilator settings for HFNC and SpO2 monitoring on Hamilton Medical ventilators 2
Ventilator settings for HFNC and SpO2 monitoring on Hamilton Medical ventilators 2

HFNC on Hamilton Medical ventilators

High flow nasal cannula therapy is available as an option on all our ventilators. We also offer compatible high flow interfaces and a compatible humidifier. In just a few steps, you can change the interface and use the same device and breathing circuit to accommodate your patient’s therapy needs. 

We also have some exclusive offers for HFNC enthusiasts where something exciting about high flow nasal cannula therapy is waiting you.

Nurse and patient with HFNC interface

Next steps

Dive deeper. Exclusive offers for HFNC enthusiasts

Something exciting about high flow nasal cannula therapy is waiting you. Visit the page to learn more.

Footnotes

  • A. If the SpO2 option is not installed, use external patient monitoring

References

  1. 2. Ischaki E, Pantazopoulos I, Zakynthinos S. Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(145):170028. Published 2017 Aug 9. doi:10.1183/16000617.0028-2017
  2. 3. Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010;55(4):408-413.
  3. 4. Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226-2237. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y
  4. 5. Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(4):2101574. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1183/13993003.01574-2021
  5. 6. Ricard JD, Roca O, Lemiale V, et al. Use of nasal high flow oxygen during acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2238-2247. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06228-7
  6. 7. Drake MG. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Adults: An Evidence-based Assessment. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(2):145-155. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-548FR
  7. 8. Kwon JW. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children: a clinical review. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020;63(1):3-7. doi:10.3345/kjp.2019.00626
  8. 9. Roca O, Messika J, Caralt B, et al. Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: The utility of the ROX index. J Crit Care. 2016;35:200-205. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.022

Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device.

Ischaki E, Pantazopoulos I, Zakynthinos S. Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(145):170028. Published 2017 Aug 9. doi:10.1183/16000617.0028-2017

Nasal high flow is a promising novel oxygen delivery device, whose mechanisms of action offer some beneficial effects over conventional oxygen systems. The administration of a high flow of heated and humidified gas mixture promotes higher and more stable inspiratory oxygen fraction values, decreases anatomical dead space and generates a positive airway pressure that can reduce the work of breathing and enhance patient comfort and tolerance. Nasal high flow has been used as a prophylactic tool or as a treatment device mostly in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, with the majority of studies showing positive results. Recently, its clinical indications have been expanded to post-extubated patients in intensive care or following surgery, for pre- and peri-oxygenation during intubation, during bronchoscopy, in immunocompromised patients and in patients with "do not intubate" status. In the present review, we differentiate studies that suggest an advantage (benefit) from other studies that do not suggest an advantage (no benefit) compared to conventional oxygen devices or noninvasive ventilation, and propose an algorithm in cases of nasal high flow application in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure of almost any cause.

High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure.

Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR. High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care. 2010;55(4):408-413.



OBJECTIVE

To compare the comfort of oxygen therapy via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus via conventional face mask in patients with acute respiratory failure. Acute respiratory failure was defined as blood oxygen saturation < 96% while receiving a fraction of inspired oxygen > or = 0.50 via face mask.

METHODS

Oxygen was first humidified with a bubble humidifier and delivered via face mask for 30 min, and then via HFNC with heated humidifier for another 30 min. At the end of each 30-min period we asked the patient to evaluate dyspnea, mouth dryness, and overall comfort, on a visual analog scale of 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest). The results are expressed as median and interquartile range values.

RESULTS

We included 20 patients, with a median age of 57 (40-70) years. The total gas flow administered was higher with the HFNC than with the face mask (30 [21.3-38.7] L/min vs 15 [12-20] L/min, P < .001). The HFNC was associated with less dyspnea (3.8 [1.3-5.8] vs 6.8 [4.1-7.9], P = .001) and mouth dryness (5 [2.3-7] vs 9.5 [8-10], P < .001), and was more comfortable (9 [8-10]) versus 5 [2.3-6.8], P < .001). HFNC was associated with higher P(aO(2)) (127 [83-191] mm Hg vs 77 [64-88] mm Hg, P = .002) and lower respiratory rate (21 [18-27] breaths/min vs 28 [25-32] breaths/min, P < .001), but no difference in P(aCO(2)).

CONCLUSIONS

HFNC was better tolerated and more comfortable than face mask. HFNC was associated with better oxygenation and lower respiratory rate. HFNC could have an important role in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure.

The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline.

Rochwerg B, Einav S, Chaudhuri D, et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2226-2237. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06312-y



PURPOSE

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent respiratory support technique which delivers high flow, heated and humidified controlled concentration of oxygen via the nasal route. Recently, its use has increased for a variety of clinical indications. To guide clinical practice, we developed evidence-based recommendations regarding use of HFNC in various clinical settings.

METHODS

We formed a guideline panel composed of clinicians, methodologists and experts in respiratory medicine. Using GRADE, the panel developed recommendations for four actionable questions.

RESULTS

The guideline panel made a strong recommendation for HFNC in hypoxemic respiratory failure compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) (moderate certainty), a conditional recommendation for HFNC following extubation (moderate certainty), no recommendation regarding HFNC in the peri-intubation period (moderate certainty), and a conditional recommendation for postoperative HFNC in high risk and/or obese patients following cardiac or thoracic surgery (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice guideline synthesizes current best-evidence into four recommendations for HFNC use in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, following extubation, in the peri-intubation period, and postoperatively for bedside clinicians.

ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure.

Oczkowski S, Ergan B, Bos L, et al. ERS clinical practice guidelines: high-flow nasal cannula in acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2022;59(4):2101574. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1183/13993003.01574-2021



BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has become a frequently used noninvasive form of respiratory support in acute settings; however, evidence supporting its use has only recently emerged. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of HFNC alongside other noninvasive forms of respiratory support in adults with acute respiratory failure (ARF).

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

The European Respiratory Society task force panel included expert clinicians and methodologists in pulmonology and intensive care medicine. The task force used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods to summarise evidence and develop clinical recommendations for the use of HFNC alongside conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for the management of adults in acute settings with ARF.

RESULTS

The task force developed eight conditional recommendations, suggesting the use of 1) HFNC over COT in hypoxaemic ARF; 2) HFNC over NIV in hypoxaemic ARF; 3) HFNC over COT during breaks from NIV; 4) either HFNC or COT in post-operative patients at low risk of pulmonary complications; 5) either HFNC or NIV in post-operative patients at high risk of pulmonary complications; 6) HFNC over COT in nonsurgical patients at low risk of extubation failure; 7) NIV over HFNC for patients at high risk of extubation failure unless there are relative or absolute contraindications to NIV; and 8) trialling NIV prior to use of HFNC in patients with COPD and hypercapnic ARF.

CONCLUSIONS

HFNC is a valuable intervention in adults with ARF. These conditional recommendations can assist clinicians in choosing the most appropriate form of noninvasive respiratory support to provide to patients in different acute settings.

Use of nasal high flow oxygen during acute respiratory failure.

Ricard JD, Roca O, Lemiale V, et al. Use of nasal high flow oxygen during acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(12):2238-2247. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06228-7

Nasal high flow (NHF) has gained popularity among intensivists to manage patients with acute respiratory failure. An important literature has accompanied this evolution. In this review, an international panel of experts assessed potential benefits of NHF in different areas of acute respiratory failure management. Analyses of the physiological effects of NHF indicate flow-dependent improvement in various respiratory function parameters. These beneficial effects allow some patients with severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure to avoid intubation and improve their outcome. They require close monitoring to not delay intubation. Such a delay may worsen outcome. The ROX index may help clinicians decide when to intubate. In immunocompromised patients, NHF reduces the need for intubation but does not impact mortality. Beneficial physiological effects of NHF have also been reported in patients with chronic respiratory failure, suggesting a possible indication in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. When intubation is required, NHF can be used to pre-oxygenate patients either alone or in combination with non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Similarly, NHF reduces reintubation alone in low-risk patients and in combination with NIV in high-risk patients. NHF may be used in the emergency department in patients who would not be offered intubation and can be better tolerated than NIV.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Adults: An Evidence-based Assessment.

Drake MG. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Adults: An Evidence-based Assessment. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(2):145-155. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-548FR

Hispanic women of Mexican origin are one of the fastest growing minority groups in the United States, but little information is available regarding the rate of breast feeding among this group of women. The breast feeding preferences of Hispanic women delivering at a southern California university hospital were determined by retrospective analysis of birth log records from 1978 to 1985. Approximately 95 percent of the Hispanic women delivering at this institution were of Mexican origin. Hispanic women had a preference for breast feeding similar to the national average for the same time period. The rate of breast feeding among Hispanic women of Mexican descent was consistently higher than previous reports from other regions of the United States.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children: a clinical review.

Kwon JW. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children: a clinical review. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020;63(1):3-7. doi:10.3345/kjp.2019.00626

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively safe and effective noninvasive ventilation method that was recently accepted as a treatment option for acute respiratory support before endotracheal intubation or invasive ventilation. The action mechanism of HFNC includes a decrease in nasopharyngeal resistance, washout of dead space, reduction in inflow of ambient air, and an increase in airway pressure. In preterm infants, HFNC can be used to prevent reintubation and initial noninvasive respiratory support after birth. In children, flow level adjustments are crucial considering their maximal efficacy and complications. Randomized controlled studies suggest that HFNC can be used in cases of moderate to severe bronchiolitis upon initial low-flow oxygen failure. HFNC can also reduce intubation and mechanical ventilation in children with respiratory failure. Several observational studies have shown that HFNC can be beneficial in acute asthma and other respiratory distress. Multicenter randomized studies are warranted to determine the feasibility and adherence of HFNC and continuous positive airway pressure in pediatric intensive care units. The development of clinical guidelines for HFNC, including flow settings, indications, and contraindications, device management, efficacy identification, and safety issues are needed, particularly in children.

Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: The utility of the ROX index.

Roca O, Messika J, Caralt B, et al. Predicting success of high-flow nasal cannula in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure: The utility of the ROX index. J Crit Care. 2016;35:200-205. doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.022



PURPOSE

The purpose of the study is to describe early predictors and to develop a prediction tool that accurately identifies the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) in pneumonia patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a 4-year prospective observational 2-center cohort study including patients with severe pneumonia treated with HFNC. High-flow nasal cannula failure was defined as need for MV. ROX index was defined as the ratio of pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-seven patients were included, of whom 44 (28.0%) eventually required MV (HFNC failure). After 12 hours of HFNC treatment, the ROX index demonstrated the best prediction accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.74 [95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.84]; P<.002). The best cutoff point for the ROX index was estimated to be 4.88. In the Cox proportional hazards model, a ROX index greater than or equal to 4.88 measured after 12 hours of HFNC was significantly associated with a lower risk for MV (hazard ratio, 0.273 [95% confidence interval, 0.121-0.618]; P=.002), even after adjusting for potential confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ARF and pneumonia, the ROX index can identify patients at low risk for HFNC failure in whom therapy can be continued after 12 hours.